Hundreds of companies from around the world have pledged to purge forest-killing activities from their supply chains, and most aim to deliver by embracing certification programs. At Wednesday’s ISEAL Conference in DC, panelists will take stock of what works, what doesn’t, and why.
Companies across the globe are instituting commitments and implementing plans for how to remove deforestation from the production of commodities – principally, palm, soy, timber & pulp and cattle. Forest Trends’ project Supply-Change.org has currently identified and publicly profiled a total of 366 such companies – more than one for each day of the year – who are acting to manage business risks, mitigate impacts of climate change, and generally make their businesses more sustainable, while ultimately appeasing stakeholder concerns.
Photo credit Lara Koritzke for ISEAL Alliance
Embedded within these zero deforestation commitments is a wide array of goals and policies – from participating in existing certification programs and meeting legal requirements, to going above and beyond the competition by initiating specific activities that reduce consumption, avoid the burning of forests, and promote traceability and transparency. On top of this, more and more companies are embracing the principle of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) when engaging with indigenous and traditional communities – embedding social outcomes into their pledges.
Among the policy elements included in these commitments, certification tends to be at the top of the list. Certification standards offer a turnkey option for sustainability. While many companies go beyond certification alone, certification schemes appear to serve as an important baseline for commitments.
The Importance of Certification
At least 77 percent of commitments tracked by Forest Trends’ Supply Change projects rely fully or partially on third-party commodity certifications to identify commitment-compliant commodity supply. Commodity certifications include those administered by multi-stakeholder roundtables such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certifications (PEFC) for timber and pulp, the Round Table for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) for palm oil, the Roundtable for Responsible Soy (RTRS) for soy, and the Leather Working Group (LWG) for leather.
While many companies go beyond certification alone, certification schemes appear to serve as an important baseline for commitments.
These questions and many more will be discussed at the ISEAL conference on May 11, 2016:
- What are the limitations of certification?
- Do certified commodities achieve a price premium?
- How can certification help companies manage risk, mitigate the impacts of climate change, and other critical sustainability issues?
- Does certification appease stakeholder concerns? How significant are the commitments to certification and how much progress are the companies making in fulfilling their commitments?
- Which other goals and policies are relevant for companies to achieve their deforestation commitment?
Supply Change data will help inform next Wednesday’s breakout session. Register here; friends of Forest Trends will receive a 10 percent discount when applying the promotional code “FOREST10”. In addition, Supply Change will be launching its second Annual Report in June. Sign up for the newsletter here to be included on report launch invitations and press release announcements.