HOME Twitter FB Forest Trends

See All Recent Publications

Publication Thumbnail: Regulating the Trade in Illegal Timber Regulating the Trade in Illegal Timber

Together, the US, EU28 and Australian markets, alongside the...

Publication Thumbnail: China’s Forest Product Imports and Exports 2006-2016: China’s Forest Product Imports and Exports 2006-2016:

As the world’s top importer and consumer of timber...

<BACK>

Publication Details - Biodiversity Offsets and the Challenge of Achieving No Net Loss

Biodiversity Offsets and the Challenge of Achieving No Net Loss

 

Toby Gardner, Amrei von Hase - International Institute for Sustainability, Forest Trends

 

Download GET DOCUMENT

 

 

Abstract

Businesses, governments, and financial institutions are increasingly adopting a policy of no net loss of biodiversity for development activities. The goal of no net loss is intended to help relieve tension between conservation and development by enabling economic gains to be achieved without concomitant biodiversity losses. biodiversity offsets represent a necessary component of a much broader mitigation strategy for achieving no net loss following prior application of avoidance, minimization, and remediation measures. However, doubts have been raised about the appropriate use of biodiversity offsets. We examined what no net loss means as a desirable conservation outcome and reviewed the conditions that determine whether, and under what circumstances, biodiversity offsets can help achieve such a goal. We propose a conceptual framework to substitute the often ad hoc approaches evident in many biodiversity offset initiatives. The relevance of biodiversity offsets to no net loss rests on 2 fundamental premises. First, offsets are rarely adequate for achieving no net loss of biodiversity alone. Second, some development effects may be too difficult or risky, or even impossible, to offset. To help to deliver no net loss through biodiversity offsets, biodiversity gains must be comparable to losses, be in addition to conservation gains that may have occurred in absence of the offset, and be lasting and protected from risk of failure. Adherence to these conditions requires consideration of the wider landscape context of development and offset activities, timing of offset delivery, measurement of biodiversity, accounting procedures and rule sets used to calculate biodiversity losses and gains and guide offset design, and approaches to managing risk. Adoption of this framework will strengthen the potential for offsets to provide an ecologically defensible mechanism that can help reconcile conservation and development.

 

Document Stats:

Release Date: April 2013
File Type: PDF [PDF]
File Size: 227 KB
Journal: Conservation Biology, 2013

 

Copyright © 2017 Forest Trends Association. All Rights Reserved.

Home | Who We Are | Initiatives | Resources | Contact Us | Support Us