HOME Twitter FB Forest Trends

See All Recent Publications

Publication Thumbnail: China’s Forest Product Imports and Exports 2006-2016: China’s Forest Product Imports and Exports 2006-2016:

As the world’s top importer and consumer of timber...

Publication Thumbnail: The Regulatory Imperative The Regulatory Imperative

This Information Brief is based on one of the...

<BACK>

Publication Details - The Ecological Component of Environmental Impact Assessment

The Ecological Component of Environmental Impact Assessment

A Critical Review of British Environmental Statements

 

S. THOMPSON , J. R. TREWEEK, D. J. THURLING

 

Download GET DOCUMENT

 

 

Abstract

Environmental assessment (EA) of the impacts of development is required under the 1985 European Directive 85/337/EEC, which is implemented in Britain primarily through the 1988 Town and Country Planning (Assessment of Environmental Effects) Regulations. Ecology provides analytical procedures for studying relationships between organisms and their environment and therefore has an obvious role in EA. The status of ecology within the British EA process was investigated by analysing 179 environmental statements (ESs) produced between 1988 and 1993. In many cases, the ecological information provided was so limited in quantity, or of such poor quality, that it was not possible to assess the ecological implications of proposed schemes. Many ESs failed to provide the data necessary to predict ecological impacts. Potential ecological impacts were reported in 93% of statements, but only 9% made any attempt to quantify them. Of those ESs which made references to ecological effects, only 45% based their ® ndings on new ecological survey information. Consultation with statutory consultees for nature conservation was reported in 48% of ESs. Although 78% of ESs mentioned mitigation measures, only 23% described them in detail. A major shortcoming was the universal failure to make any commitment to monitoring of development impacts. In addition to the lack of formal requirements for monitoring, the lack of guidance for ecologists and developers involved in EA is concluded to be a major factor behind some of the shortcomings summarized in this paper.

 

Document Stats:

Release Date: July 1997
File Type: PDF [PDF]
File Size: 235 KB
Journal:

 

Copyright © 2017 Forest Trends Association. All Rights Reserved.

Home | Who We Are | Initiatives | Resources | Contact Us | Support Us